Thursday, January 25, 2018

8 Types of Bras for a Strapless Dress

How to wear a bra with a strapless dress

Wearing a strapless dress is sexy and stylish, but can also be a challenge. Sometimes, these gowns can make a good fashion statement. Other times, you might wish you didn’t wear it in the first place.

The type of bra you wear with your strapless dress can mean either comfort, distress or wardrobe malfunctions. The first thing that comes to mind is a strapless bra. But this may not always be a good choice especially to busty women.

There are clever ways of choosing a strapless bra that works. On the other hand, there are strategies of avoiding a strapless bra, and still get the comfort and support you need. Below are 8 types of bras that you can wear with your strapless outfit.

1. Strapless Bra

Strapless bra

If you have to use a strapless bra, make sure it is your correct size. You might get away with wearing the wrong size of an ordinary bra. But you won’t get away with this one. If you are not sure about your size, go to a store where they do bra fitting.

When wearing a normal bra, about 20% of the support comes from the shoulder straps. With a strapless bra, all the support must come from the band. That’s why most strapless bras will have wider bands.

Qualities of a Good Strapless Bra

  • Comfortable
  • Band is wider and lower
  • Coated with silicone on the inside to keep the cups from falling
  • The band should be firm around the under-bust
  • Should not be too tight above the bust
  • Cups are made of sturdy material so the bust does not sag

Girls with small perky boobs can wear strapless bras with thin bands. This is because there is little chance of the bra slipping. But if you are big busted and you still have to keep adjusting your bra, try a long-line strapless bra. You can also use fashion tape or glue.

2. Invisible/Clear Strap Bra

Invisible bra

The straps (and sometimes the band) of invisible bras are made of transparent material. Sometimes, the same may have a tint that goes well with a good number skin tones. This is meant to increase the camouflage effect.

The band closure is usually located at the side rather than the center of the back. Some of the bras may also have a front closure. In some instances, the back band may be criss-cross.

Clear strap bras are ideal for:
  • Strapless dresses
  • Backless dresses
  • Dresses which bear the shoulders

3. Adhesive/Stick-On Bra

Adhesive bra

A sticky or adhesive bra is perhaps the best option for a backless dress. But they also work fine with strapless outfits. They are mostly made of silicone or foam.

Fabric adhesive bras do not stick to the breast. They rather have re-usable adhesive at the side wings. They look like an ordinary bra with the straps and the better part of the band removed.

4. Show-Off Bra

Show-off bra

A regular bra is meant to be underwear. It is therefore weird to let parts of it stick out. But there are special bras which are engineered to be cute enough for showing off.

Show-off bras have patterns, attractive lace or a sexy style. Some of them have a simple design like that of a tank top, bralette or sports bra. You can wear such a bra when;

  1. Going to the beach
  2. Wearing a see-through top
  3. Wearing shoulder-bearing clothing
  4. Hiking or camping

5. Delicate Bralette

Delicate bralette

Delicate bralettes are often made of thin and sometimes translucent material. They are therefore not as stunning as regular bras, which are hard to ignore if they show under clothes.

Showing off a filmy bralette does not exhibit bad taste. You can make your own fashion statement with this kind of outfit. They are simply meant to be seen.

6. Bandeau Bra/Tube Top

Bandeau

A bandeau is a form of elasticized strapless bra. But it is more stylish and comfy. It is perfect if you want to show off your shoulders with your strapless outfit.

Like most strapless bras, they don’t have shaping around the bust area. You should thus buy your correct size to avoid issues linked with strapless dresses. If your breasts are too big or too saggy, a bandeau may not be a good option for you.

7. Strapless Bodysuit

Strapless bodysuit

If you want the convenience of a strapless bra, but without the risk of your bra falling off, go for a strapless bodysuit. By anchoring to the shaping of your torso, a strapless bodysuit acts like a corset. There is no chance of it falling off your bust. This is probably the best option for busty ladies.

8. Strapless Body Shaper

Strapless body shaper

Body shapers have been used for a while to smooth bulges and give the wearer an even look. Because they are made of stretchy material, they make a woman feel more secure and under control.

If you wear a strapless body shaper under a strapless dress, you are worried less about your bust drooping or your dress slipping. Unlike bodysuits, the bottom side is made like a skirt.

How to wear a bra with a strapless dress


If none of the above options are fine with you, you can try pasties or a corset-style strapless dress with built-in support. As strapless dresses are sexy and elegant, you can’t give up on finding good support for your bust. Using these tips will aid you in finding the perfect bra for wearing under your strapless dress.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

WILL TECHNOLOGY KILL US?

WILL TECHNOLOGY KILL US?

WILL TECHNOLOGY KILL US?
The Digital Revolution along with nuclear weapons and artificial intelligence are examples of technology that can result in human extermination. The reports below from the London Telegraph illustrate how technology has become the Black Plague of today.
 Note: The solar storm of  of 1859 named the “Carrington Event”  only affected   the telegraph  system. Imagine what would happen if such a solar blast occurred today. — RH   
Telegraph
 The truth about Hard Sun’s solar apocalypse: just how scared should we be? 
 Tristram Fane Saunders
7 JANUARY 2018 • 7:00AM
You might not have noticed it, but two years ago an event took place which might just have brought about the collapse of modern civilisation.

In July 2012, an enormous flare burst from the far side of the sun. Had it happened just one week earlier, it would have been pointing directly towards the Earth, causing the worst geomagnetic storm in over 400 years.

As Reuters reported at the time, the resulting magnetic disruption could have “fried the world’s electricity grids and left hundreds of millions of customers without power for months or even years”.

Next time, we might not be so lucky. A new BBC series, Hard Sun, imagines a similar solar phenomenon. Two London coppers (played by Jim Sturgess and Agyness Deyn) stumble across a USB drive containing a secret digital dossier, counting down towards an “extinction level event” in five years time.

In early episodes, there is some doubt about the cause – “Did it refer to a meteor, or a comet?” one character asks – but it doesn’t take Scotland Yard’s finest to figure out the truth: the drama begins with the sight of giant flares leaping from the surface of the sun.
“This isn’t science fiction. This is the real world,” the show’s writer Neil Cross has said. But how plausible is it? Should we be concerned? And for those of us who dozed off in science at school, what exactly is a geomagnetic storm anyway?

“The surface of the Sun is an incredibly dynamic place,” says astrophysicist Dr Katie Mack. In an active phase, it can release bursts of plasma and radiation into space. If directed towards the earth, these eruptions (known as Coronal Mass Ejections, or CMEs), can disrupt the Earth’s magnetic fields in what we call a geomagnetic storm. It’s a CME that we see in the opening moments of Hard Sun’s first episode.

“It can be hugely disruptive if it’s very strong,” Dr Mack explains. “Sudden variations in the electromagnetic field can cause sparks to pass between electronic components, shorting out circuits. The biggest dangers would be to satellites (including the GPS system) and to the power grid on Earth.”

The closest we have come to this kind of storm was the Carrington Event of 1859, named after the British astronomer Richard Carrington, who discovered a link between the “two patches of intensely bright and white light” he noticed erupting from sunspots just before the event, and the strange phenomena that followed. During this major geomagnetic storm, the Northern Lights were visible as far south as Honolulu, while eerie illuminations made the night almost as bright as the day.
One contemporary newspaper quoted a woman from Sullivan’s Island, South Carolina, who was dazzled by what she saw. “The whole island was illuminated,” she said. “The sea reflected the phenomenon, and no one could look at it without thinking of the passage in the Bible which says, ‘the sea was turned to blood.’ The shells on the beach, reflecting light, resembled coals of fire.”

For anyone working on the fledgeling electrical telegraph system, the effects were far stranger. Sparks leapt from the machines, shocking the operators and setting fire to highly flammable telegraph paper. The surge of energy running through the wires was strong enough to melt the instruments’ platinum contacts.

While many telegraph communications stopped dead, a few operators in Boston found that their transmitters still worked even with the batteries unplugged, and that they were able to send telegraph messages using only the current from the aurora.

Today, with electricity and satellite communications playing an essential part in our daily lives, the effects would be far more serious.

A CME of that kind would not only knock out power generators, but also telecommunication towers. With no radio or TV news, and mobile phone networks dead, the sudden and unexplained black-out could easily lead to a mass panic and rioting. Worse still would be the potential failure of the all-important electric cooling systems at nuclear power plants; the result could be a disaster on the scale of the 2012 Fukushima incident.
A report published in 2013, following the previous year’s major CME, warned that “our society would still be picking up the pieces.” One of the report’s authors, Dr Daniel Baker of Colorado’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, has suggested that it could take up to 10 years to fully recover from such an incident.

To make matters worse, in real life – unlike in Hard Sun – we wouldn’t have five years to prepare for it. At best, our advance notice would be closer to a single day. “We get 19 hours or more for a coronal mass ejection, but we don’t know whether or not it will hit Earth, or what the conditions may be,” Plasma physicist Dr Melanie Windridge told theMail in November. “Fifteen minutes warning is all we have to tell us about the specific conditions of what will hit us and how problematic it could be.”
The chance of another enormous solar flare erupting in the next decade has been estimated at just one in eight. Of course, the chance of it being directed at Earth is much smaller, and there are steps we can take to prepare for such an event. In the US, the Department of Energy is working on a “strategic transformer reserve” – a system for providing power stations with back-up transformers to quickly replace any that might be knocked out by a geomagnetic storm.

Other possible safety measures include using capacitor banks to absorb excess energy, or constructing Faraday cages around irreplacable pieces of equipment to block out electro-magnetic radiation. Even so, safeguarding the entire grid in this way could cost up to $30 billion.

But without these safeguards, would we really be looking at the kind of catastrophe imagined in Hard Sun? In the BBC One series, when detectives Renko and Hicks access the secret USB drive, a number of frightening and unintentionally ridiculous phrases flash up on screen: “magnetic disruption”; “homicide rates”; “body bag demand” (is the bag shortage itself really that much of a concern?); and more seriously, “crop failure”.
This nightmarish scenario, Dr Mack tells me, is a bit far-fetched. “I really doubt it could harm surface agriculture,” she says. “For something like that, you’d need something strong enough to seriously damage the magnetic field or atmosphere, and I don’t see how a CME from the Sun could be that powerful. It would be a short-term disruption and would mess with electromagnetic fields for a bit but it wouldn’t strip the Earth’s protection completely. Screwing with the power grid could harm a heck of a lot of things, but the CME itself isn’t going to kill all our plants.”

So, it’s not the end of the world after all? “We’re not doomed,” Dr Mack tells me, patiently. “There are procedures in place to try to shore up the power grid. Losing GPS and other satellite communications (and possibly cell phone communication) would be a huge mess but we’d recover.”

But what about all those BBC One viewers who have been left cowering behind the sofa? “We’re still learning a lot about the Sun. For example, the upcoming Parker Solar Probe will get up close and personal with the solar corona, hopefully solving some of the abiding mysteries and helping us make better predictions,” says Dr Mack. “If you’re worried, encourage more investment in space science!”
Note: If any other machine in history had been as unreliable as digital technology no one would have given it houseroom. It is only because we have allowed ourselves to become  dangerously dependent on the technology that it is tolerated. — RH 
Telegraph
Meltdown bug: Microsoft halts security updates after PC owners report ‘blue screen of death’
 Margi Murphy
9 JANUARY 2018 • 2:40PM
Microsoft was forced to abruptly suspend security fixes for Meltdown and Spectre flaws over fears they might render millions of devices nothing more than expensive bricks.

Customers who have received the latest security update claimed they were met with “blue screen errors”, the so-called “blue screen of death”, or frozen screens on Windows 10, Windows 8.1 and Windows 7, Microsoft said in a blog post.  

The technology company is working to send updates to billions of devices running Windows operating systems and are currently vulnerable to hacking thanks to a hardware flaw. 

Last week it emerged that the security hole, which has existed in Intel, AMD and ARM chips for up to twenty years, could be leaking confidential information including passwords, files and photos from a range of devices including iPhones, iPads, Android smartphones and PCs. Apple and Google are also sending out security updates to affected products.

But in the latest twist for the Meltdown debacle, Microsoft’s hopes that remote software updates would solve the problem has been thwarted, as devices running AMD chips are not reacting as expected. Customers have also reported issues loading the start menu or taskbar after installing the updates. 
“To prevent AMD customers from getting into an unbootable state, Microsoft will temporarily pause sending the following Windows operating system updates to devices with impacted AMD processors at this time,” a Microsoft spokesman said in a statement.
The microchip bugs, which affect almost every computer processor in the world, were disclosed in an article by the Register.  However, Intel had been made aware of the flaws – named Meltdown and Spectre – in June 2017 by Google researchers.

Since the announcement, it was feared that opportunistic criminals would seize the chance to exploit this flaw to steal passwords for online services, or personal and confidential files. Companies are working around the clock to create a software “workaround” to patch the holes. The alternative – something which was quickly rejected by technology companies – would be to recall millions of pieces of hardware.

Intel’s chief executive broke his silence on the matter on Monday evening during his keynote speech at the Consumer Electronics Showin Las Vegas, claiming that 90 per cent of devices should be secured “within a week”. 

Computing giant IBM also appeared to fall victim to the bug this week, with workers reportedly being told to stop updating their systems as new security fixes were playing havoc with antivirus protection already put in place. 

Telegraph
Millions of computers using Intel chips prone to hacking – and fix ‘slows machines by 30 per cent.’
Software giants Microsoft and Amazon scramble to issue fix for Intel flaw, sacrificing computer performance in the meantime 
 Margi Murphy
3 JANUARY 2018 • 11:45AM
Millions of computers using Intel chips are prone to hacking because of a flaw that went unnoticed for a decade, it has emerged. 

Software giants are currently working on a fix for the flaw but industry experts have warned it could potentially slow down all devices running the chips by up to 30 per cent.
The flaw could allow hackers a “persistent and undetectable backdoor into someone’s computer”, Mike Godfrey, cyber expert at Insinia Security told the Telegraph. 

The flaw grants access to a computer’s kernel, which runs and stores every function on the device, and means an outsider could potentially bypass antivirus or firewall security software without the owner knowing. It could allow malicious software to steal passwords and sensitive files or cryptographic keys, necessary for keeping us safe online. 

The National Cyber Security Centre, an arm of GCHQ issued a statement on Wednesday afternoon advising individuals to install updates when they became available.  
“We are aware of reports about a potential flaw affecting some computer processors,” a spokesman said.

“At this stage there is no evidence of any malicious exploitation and patches are being produced for the major platforms.”

Intel chips appear in almost all personal computers and other technology. Financial institutions and businesses with large IT infrastructure may have been compromised for several years, Godfrey added. Train systems and autonomous cars also use the chips.   
Intel has reportedly warned software vendors including Microsoft, Amazon and Apple, who are believed to be creating a workaround to fix the flaw. But this fix could make computers 30 per cent slower, according to technology website The Register. 

Matthew Hickey, security expert and co-founder at My Hacker House said: “The real problem is for companies trying to support customers on their servers. Hypothetically, if a company once had capacity to support 100,000 users, that number may drop to 70,000.
“It could have real cost implications for businesses that have been using or intend to use cloud technology and Intel servers.”  
The bug has been known by security workers for some time, but is not due to be publicly disclosed until software giants like Amazon and Microsoft have issued a patch, so that the details cannot be exploited by criminals. Fixes are expected to be released in the next week.

Intel itself is unable to fix the flaw, so guarding against it requires a software update that will slow computers by between 5 per cent and 30 per cent, or to fix the processors completely.

Hundreds of millions of devices could be affected, including those still on the production lines. 

Mr Hickey added: “The real problems are for companies who are trying to get the best performance out of servers to support so many users. They may find that they had the capacity to support 100,000 users on their software, but that number could drop to 70,000. It could have real cost implications for business.”
It is unclear whether anyone has been hacked thanks to this flaw, but penetration tester at Insinia Security, Matthew Carr, told the Telegraph that it was not inconceivable that a vulnerability that has existed for ten years had already been exploited by nation states, criminal gangs or expert level hackers. 

Chip rival AMD shares soared 7.2 per cent after the disclosure on Wednesday, while Intel dropped to a low of 3.8 per cent.

Intel have yet to comment on the matter. Microsoft had nothing to share and Google, Amazon and Apple are yet to comment. 


Monday, January 15, 2018

IT - Manlio Dinucci -- L’arte della guerra: Italia in armi dal Baltico all’Africa

CoA mil ITA brg NRDC IT.png

L’arte della guerra

Italia in armi dal Baltico all’Africa

Manlio Dinucci

Che cosa avverrebbe se caccia russi Sukhoi Su 35, schierati nell’aeroporto di Zurigo a una decina di minuti di volo da Milano, pattugliassero il confine con l’Italia con la motivazione di proteggere la Svizzera dall’aggressione italiana? A Roma l’intero parlamento insorgerebbe, chiedendo immediate contromisure diplomatiche e militari.

Lo stesso parlamento, invece, sostanzialmente accetta e passa sotto silenzio la decisione NATO di schierare 8 caccia italiani Eurofighter Typhoon nella base di Amari in Estonia, a una decina di minuti di volo da San Pietroburgo, per pattugliare il confine con la Russia, con la motivazione di proteggere i paesi baltici dalla «aggressione russa». La fake news con la quale la NATO sotto comando USA giustifica la sempre più pericolosa escalation miitare contro la Russia in Europa.

Per dislocare in Estonia gli 8 cacciabombardieri, con un personale di 250 uomini, si spendono (con denaro proveniente dalle casse pubbliche italiane) 12,5 milioni di euro da gennaio a settembre, cui si aggiungono le spese operative: un’ora di volo di un Eurofighter costa 40 mila euro, l’equivalente del salario lordo annuo di un lavoratore.

Questa è solo una delle 33 missioni militari internazionali in cui l’Italia è impegnata in 22 paesi. A quelle condotte da tempo nei Balcani, in Libano e Afghanistan, si aggiungono le nuove missioni che – sottolinea la Deliberazione del governo – «si concentrano in un'area geografica, l'Africa, ritenuta di prioritario interesse strategico in relazione alle esigenze di sicurezza e difesa nazionali».

In Libia, gettata nel caos dalla guerra NATO del 2011 con la partecipazione dell’Italia, l’Italia oggi «sostiene le autorità nell'azione di pacificazione e stabilizzazione del Paese e nel rafforzamento del controllo e contrasto dell'immigrazione illegale». L’operazione, con l’impiego di 400 uomini e 130 veicoli, comporta una spesa annua  di 50 milioni di euro, compresa una indennità media di missione di 5 mila euro mensili corrisposta (oltre la paga) a ciascun partecipante alla missione.

In Tunisia l’Italia partecipa alla Missione NATO di supporto alle «forze di sicurezza» governative, impegnate a reprimere le manifestazioni popolari contro il peggioramento delle condizioni di vita.

In Niger l’Italia inizia nel 2018 la missione di supporto alle «forze di sicurezza» governative, «nell’ambito di uno sforzo congiunto europeo e statunitense per la stabilizzazione dell’area», comprendente anche Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin, Mauritania, Ciad, Nigeria e Repubblica Centrafricana (dove l’Italia partecipa a una missione UE di «supporto»). È una delle aree più ricche di materie prime strategiche – petrolio, gas naturale, uranio, coltan, oro, diamanti, manganese, fosfati e altre – sfruttate da multinazionali statunitensi ed europee, il cui oligopolio è però ora messo a rischio dalla crescente presenza economica cinese. Da qui la «stabilizzazione» militare dell’area, cui partecipa l’Italia inviando in Niger 470 uomini e 130 mezzi terrestri, con una spesa annua di 50 milioni di euro.

A tali impegni si aggiunge quello che l’Italia ha assunto il 10 gennaio: il comando della componente terrestre della NATO Response Force, rapidamente proiettabile in qualsiasi parte del mondo. Nel 2018 è agli ordini del Comando multinazionale di Solbiate Olona (Varese), di cui l’Italia è «la nazione guida». Ma – chiarisce il Ministero della Difesa – tale comando è «alle dipendenze del Comandante Supremo delle Forze Alleate in Europa», sempre nominato dal presidente degli Stati Uniti. L’Italia è quindi sì «nazione guida», ma sempre subordinata alla catena di comando del Pentagono. 


Il manifesto, 16 gennaio 2018

PT -- Manlio Dinucci -- A Arte da Guerra: A Itália em Armas do Báltico até África

 CoA mil ITA brg NRDC IT.png
A Arte da Guerra

A Itália em armas do Báltico até África

Manlio Dinucci

O que aconteceria se caças bombardeiros russos, Sukhoi Su 35, introduzidos no aeroporto de Zurique, a cerca de dez minutos de voo de Milão, patrulhassem a fronteira com a Itália sob o pretexto de proteger a Suíça da agressão italiana? Em Roma, todo o Parlamento insurgir-se-ia, exigindo diligências diplomáticas e militares imediatas.

Por outro lado, o mesmo Parlamento aceita e, essencialmente, mantém em silêncio a decisão da NATO de colocar 8 aviões italianos de combate, Eurofighter Typhoon, na base de Amari, na Estónia, a dez minutos de vôo de São Petersburgo, para patrulhar a fronteira com a Rússia, com a argumentação de proteger os países bálticos da "agressão russa". É uma notícia falsa com a qual a NATO, sob o comando dos EUA, justifica a escalada militar cada vez mais perigosa, na Europa, contra a Rússia.

Para deslocar os 8 caças bombardeiros na Estónia, com uma equipa de 250 homens, são gastos (com dinheiro proveniente de fundos públicos italianos) 12,8 milhões de euros, de Janeiro a Setembro, além das despesas operacionais: uma hora de um Eurofighter custa 40 mil euros, o que equivale ao salário bruto anual de um trabalhador.

Esta é só uma das 33 missões militares internacionais em que a Itália está envolvida em 22 países. Às actividades conduzidas durante longo tempo nos Balcãs, no Líbano e no Afeganistão, juntam-se as novas tarefas, que  - sublinha a Deliberação do Governo – “se concentram numa área geográfica, a África, considerada de interesse estratégico prioritário em relação às exigências da segurança e da defesa nacional ".

Na Líbia, lançada no caos pela guerra da NATO, em 2011, com a participação da Itália, a mesma Itália que hoje "apoia as autoridades na acção de pacificação e estabilização do país e no fortalecimento do controlo e oposição à imigração ilegal". A operação, que compreende 400 homens e 130 veículos, acarreta uma despesa anual de 50 milhões de euros, incluindo um subsídio médio de 5 mil euros pagos (além do salário), a cada participante nessa missão.

Na Tunísia, a Itália participa na Missão NATO de apoio às "forças de segurança" do governo, empenhadas em reprimir as manifestações populares contra a deterioração das condições de vida.

No Níger, a Itália inicia, em 2018, a missão de apoio às "forças de segurança" do governo, "no âmbito de um esforço conjunto europeu e americano para estabilizar a área", incluindo o Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin, Mauritânia, Chade, Nigéria e a República Centro-Africana (onde a Itália participa numa missão de "apoio" da União Europeia). É uma das áreas mais ricas em matérias-primas estratégicas - petróleo, gás natural, urânio, coltan, ouro, diamantes, manganês, fosfatos e outros - exploradas por multinacionais americanas e europeias, cujo oligopólio está agora em risco devido à presença económica chinesa progressiva. Daí a "estabilização" militar da área, na qual a Itália participa, enviando para o Níger, 470 homens e 130 veículos terrestres, que envolve uma despesa anual de 50 milhões de euros. 

A estes compromissos adiciona-se aquele que a Itália assumiu em 10 de Janeiro: o comando da componente terrestre da NATO Response Force, lançada rapidamente em qualquer lugar do mundo. Em 2018, está às ordens do Comando Multinacional de Solbiate Olona (Varese), da qual a Itália é "a nação líder". Mas - esclarece o Ministério da Defesa - este comando está “sob a dependência do Comandante Supremo das Forças Aliadas na Europa", que é sempre nomeado pelo Presidente dos Estados Unidos. A Itália é, portanto, uma "nação líder", mas sempre subordinada à cadeia de comando do Pentágono.

Il manifesto, 16 de Janeiro de 2018

Tradutora: Maria Luísa de Vasconcellos

Manlio Dinucci -- GUERRA NUCLEARE IL GIORNO PRIMA Da Hiroshima a oggi: chi e come ci porta alla catastrofe






La lancetta dell’«Orologio dell’Apocalisse» – il segnatempo che sul Bollettino degli Scienziati Atomici statunitensi indica a quanti minuti siamo dalla mezzanotte della guerra nucleare – è stata spostata in avanti: da 3 a mezzanotte nel 2015 a 2,5 minuti nel 2017. Tale fatto passa però inosservato o, comunque, non suscita particolari allarmi. 

Sembra di vivere nel film The Day After (1983), in quella cittadina del Kansas dove la vita scorre tranquilla accanto ai silos dei missili nucleari, con la gente che il giorno prima ascolta distrattamente le notizie sul precipitare della situazione internazionale, finché vede i missili lanciati contro l’URSS e poco dopo spuntare i funghi atomici delle testate nucleari sovietiche. 

Questo libro ricostruisce la storia della corsa agli armamenti nucleari dal 1945 ad oggi, sullo sfondo dello scenario geopolitico mondiale, contribuendo a colmare il vuoto di informazione creato ad arte su questo tema di vitale importanza. Si è diffusa la sensazione che una guerra nucleare sia ormai inconcepibile e si è creata di conseguenza la pericolosa illusione che si possa convivere con la Bomba. Ossia con una potenza distruttiva che può cancellare la specie umana e quasi ogni altra forma di vita. Lo possiamo evitare, mobilitandoci per eliminare le armi nucleari dalla faccia della Terra.  Finché siamo in tempo, il giorno prima.   
L’autore, giornalista e saggista,  collaboratore de il manifesto e di Pandora TV, è membro del Comitato No Guerra No Nato
Con Zambon Editore ha pubblicato L’Arte della Guerra / Annali della strategia USA/NATO (1990-2016).
È stato direttore esecutivo per l’Italia della International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, associazione insignita nel 1985 del Premio Nobel per la Pace per aver «fornito preziosi servigi all'umanità divulgando informazioni autorevoli e diffondendo la consapevolezza sulle catastrofiche conseguenze di un conflitto nucleare». 

INDICE

1    La nascita della Bomba 
1.1  Il bombardamento atomico di Hiroshima e Nagasaki
1.2  Gli effetti dell’esplosione nucleare su una città
1.3  Gli effetti della ricaduta radioattiva
1.4  L’inverno nucleare
2    La corsa agli armamenti nucleari 
2.1  Il confronto nucleare USA-URSS
2.2  I missili balistici intercontinentali
2.3  La crisi dei missili a Cuba e l’ingresso della Cina tra le potenze nucleari
2.4  La pianificazione dell’attacco nucleare
2.5  Il Trattato sullo spazio esterno e il Trattato di non-proliferazione 
2.6  I missili balistici a testate multiple indipendenti 
2.7  La bomba N
2.8  I trattati sui missili anti-balistici e sulla limitazione delle armi strategiche
2.9  La Bomba segreta di Israele 
2.10  L’ingresso di Sudafrica, India e Pakistan tra le potenze nucleari
3    La polveriera nucleare 
3.1  Un milione di Hiroshima
3.2  La «valigetta nucleare»
3.3  I falsi allarmi di attacco nucleare
3.4  Gli incidenti con armi nucleari
3.5  L’inquinamento radioattivo dei test e degli impianti nucleari
3.6  Il legame tra nucleare militare e civile
3.7  Gli incidenti alle centrali nucleari
3.8  I movimenti antinucleari durante la guerra fredda 
4    Le guerre del dopo guerra fredda 
4.1  Il mondo al bivio
4.2  Golfo: la prima guerra del dopo guerra fredda
4.3  Le armi a uranio impoverito 
4.4  Il riorientamento strategico degli Stati Uniti 
4.5  Il riorientamento strategico della NATO
4.6  L’intervento NATO nella crisi balcanica e la guerra contro la Jugoslavia 
4.7  Terreno di prova dei bombardieri da attacco nucleare e uso massiccio di armi a uranio impoverito 
4.8  Il superamento dell’Articolo 5 e la conferma della leadership USA
4.9  Il «Nuovo Modello di Difesa» dell’Italia
4.10  L’espansione della NATO ad Est verso la Russia
5    La messinscena del disarmo 
5.1  Le armi nucleari e lo «scudo anti-missili» nella ristrutturazione delle forze USA
5.2  I trattati START sulla riduzione delle armi strategiche 
5.3  La messa al bando dei test nucleari e i test «subcritici»
5.4  Il Trattato di Mosca e il nuovo START
5.5  L’ingresso della Corea del Nord tra le potenze nucleari
5.6  Altri paesi in grado di fabbricare armi nucleari 
5.7  Le armi chimiche e biologiche  
6     La nuova offensiva USA/NATO 
6.1  11 Settembre: maxi-attacco terroristico in mondovisione 
6.2  11 Settembre: le falle della versione ufficiale 
6.3  Afghanistan: l’inizio della «guerra globale al terrorismo» 
6.4  La seconda guerra contro Iraq
6.5  La guerra contro la Libia
6.6  La guerra coperta contro la Siria e la formazione dell’ISIS
6.7  Il colpo di stato in Ucraina 
6.8  Le guerre segrete dal volto umanitario 
   L’Europa sul fronte nucleare 
7.1  L’Europa nel riarmo nucleare del Premio Nobel per la pace
7.2  Italia: portaerei nucleare USA/NATO nel Mediterraneo
7.3  La B61-12, nuova bomba nucleare USA per l’Italia e l’Europa 
7.4  L’escalation USA/NATO in Europa
7.5  Lo «scudo» USA sull’Europa 
8     Gli scenari dell’Apocalisse 
8.1   L’escalation qualitativa del confronto nucleare
8.2   La preparazione del first strike nucleare 
8.3   Armi elettromagnetiche e laser e aerei robot spaziali per la guerra nucleare
8.4   La mortale minaccia del plutonio e il monito inascoltato di Fukushima 
8.5   La minaccia del terrorismo nucleare 
8.6   Le nanoarmi: potenziali detonatori della guerra nucleare

9     Il giorno prima finché siamo in tempo
9.1   La strategia dell’Impero Americano d’Occidente
9.2   Il sistema bellico planetario degli Stati Uniti d’America 
9.3   L’ancoraggio dell’Italia alla macchina da guerra USA/NATO
9.4  Il disancoraggio dalla macchina da guerra USA/NATO, per un’Italia sovrana e neutrale, libera dalle armi nucleari 


304 PAGINE   /  15 EURO  / NELLE LIBRERIE FELTRINELLI E IN ALTRE / SU AMAZON.IT 

Lavrov holds annual press conference

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Israel’s Takeover of the Internet

Israel’s Takeover of the Internet
Israel’s Takeover of the Internet
It has been learned that major social media and internet service providers have, throughout the past year, been meeting secretly with the United States and Israeli governments to remove content as well as ban account holders from their sites. — Philip Giraldi
The ACLU is working to reverse the FCC’s decision on behalf of the CIA and the Israel lobby to destroy Internet neutrality.
What is extraordinary is that the rest of the world has not created its own Internet that cannot be censured by Washington and Israel.
Expect Even Less Freedom of Internet in 2018
Expect Even Less Freedom of Internet in 2018
Users of social media have been increasingly reporting that their accounts have been either censored, blocked or suspended during the past year. Initially, some believed that the incidents might be technical in nature, with overloaded servers struggling to keep up with the large and growing number of accounts, but it eventually emerged that the interference was deliberate and was focused on individuals and groups that were involved in political or social activities considered to be controversial.
At the end of last year a number of Russian accounts on Facebook and elsewhere were suspended over the allegations that social media had been used to spread so-called false news that had possibly materially affected the 2016 presidential election in the United States. Even though it proved impossible to demonstrate that the relatively innocuous Russian efforts had any impact in comparison to the huge investment in advertising and propaganda engaged in by the two major parties, social media quickly responded to the negative publicity.
Now it has been learned that major social media and internet service providers have, throughout the past year, been meeting secretly with the United States and Israeli governments to remove content as well as ban account holders from their sites. The United States and Israel have no legal right to tell private companies what to do but it is clearly understood that the two governments can make things very difficult for those service providers that do not fall in line. Israel has threatened to limit access to sites like Facebook or to ban it altogether while the U.S. Justice Department can use terrorist legislation, even if implausible, to force compliance. Washington recently forced Facebook to cancel the account of the Chechen Republic’s leader Ramzan Kadyrov, a Putin loyalist that the White House has recently “sanctioned.”
Israel is not surprisingly most active in patrolling the Internet as it is keen to keep out any material sympathetic to the Palestinian cause or critical of Israeli treatment of Arabs. Its security services scan the stories being surfaced and go to the service providers to ask that material be deleted or blocked based on the questionable proposition that it constitutes “incitement” to violence. Facebook reportedly cooperates 95% of the time to delete material or shut down accounts. Palestinian groups, which use social networking on the internet to communicate, have been especially hard hit, with ten leading administrators’ accounts being removed in 2017. Israeli accounts including material threatening to kill Arabs are not censored.
Microsoft, Google, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook are all also under pressure to cooperate with pro-Israel private groups in the United States, to include the powerful Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADL seeks “to engineer new solutions to stop cyberhate” by blocking “hate language,” which includes any criticism of Israel that might even implausibly be construed as anti-Semitism. Expanding restrictions on what is being defined as “hate speech” will undoubtedly become common in social media and more generally all across the internet in 2018.
The internet, widely seen as a highway where everyone could communicate and share ideas freely, is actually a toll road that is increasingly managed by a group of very large corporations that, when acting in unison, control what is seen and not seen. Search engines already are set up to prioritize information from paid “sponsors,” which come up prominently but often have nothing to do with what material is most relevant. And the role of intrusive governments in dictating to Facebook and other sites who will be heard and who will be silenced should also be troubling, as it means that information that would benefit the public might never be seen, particularly if it is embarrassing to powerful interests. And speaking of powerful interests, groups like the ADL with partisan agendas will undoubtedly be able to dictate norms of behavior to the service providers, leading to still more loss of content and relevancy for those who are looking for information.
All things considered, the year 2018 will be a rough one for those who are struggling to maintain the internet as a source of relatively free information. Governments and interest groups have seen the threat posed by such liberty and are reacting to it. They will do their best to bring it under control.