Thursday, October 31, 2019

The Reign of Terror: what was it?

‘Nobody had dreamed of establishing a system of terror. It established itself by force of circumstances.’ Quoted William Doyle, Oxford History of the French Revolution, 266.
Nevertheless, the Terror was government policy from the autumn of 1793 until its abandonment in August 1794.

What was the Terror? It was the period of nine months in the course of which around 16,000 people were guillotined. Famous victims included Marie Antoinette, the Girondins and eventually the Dantonist Jacobin faction. The terror ended with the execution of Robespierre in July 1794. The scene of these executions was the Place de la Révolution. The Terror was accompanied by a policy of de-christianization – churches were closed and the calendar redrawn.

But the bulk of the victims of the Terror were ordinary people and were shot or drowned as well as guillotined. The main scenes of the provincial Terror were Lyons (Doyle, 254), the Vendée and Nantes, the scene of the noyades (256-7). The total number who died in the Terror was around 30,000. More people died in Ireland in 1798 and in Poland in 1794.

The Terror was triggered by war, resistance within France to the Revolution, the increasingly violent actions of the sans-culottes in the face of economic hardship. It also developed its own momentum.

In September 1793 a spontaneous demonstration by manual workers for higher wages and more bread pressured the Convention into a series of radical emergency measures. On 17 September the Law of Suspects empowered watch committees to arrest anyone who had in any way shown themselves hostile to the Revolution (Doyle, 251). On 29 September a General Maximum Law imposed price controls on a wide range of goods. In October the Committee of Public Safety took on the central direction of the entire state apparatus.

The first phase of the Terror was spontaneous, unco-ordinated and difficult to control. Up to 10,000 people, arrested under the Law of Suspects, may have died in custody in over-crowded prisons; others were murdered or lynched with no official record.

The second phase was a government response to the anarchy of mass deaths and de-christianization. On 4 December 1793 the Revolutionary Government passed the Law of 14 Frimaire, a measure of extreme centralization, which vested all power in the Committee of Public Safety (Doyle, 262-4). The Law of Frimaire, and power struggles within the Committee of Public Safety, allowed the elimination of the advocates of crowd disorder (the Hébertistes) in March 1794. The mass of executions marked the end of the sans-culottes as a political force (Doyle, 271).

From early 1794 Robespierre (right), member of the Committee of Public Safety and leading speaker in the Convention became increasingly obsessed with cleansing the Republic of corruption. In April the Dantonists were executed ((Doyle, 274). Danton’s death marked the inauguration of the Republic of Virtue, which was characterized by a concentration of power at the centre. In May the cult of the Supreme Being was established (as a counter to anti-Christian excesses). The Law of 22 Prairial (10 June) marks the height of the Terror. Between March and August 1794 2,639 people were guillotined, over half dying between June and July (Doyle, 275).

Robespierre was brought down by the 9Thermidor coup (27 July), executed under the provisions of the Law of Prairial. Over 100 of his supporters were executed on the following days.
‘By implying that those of whom he disapproved or with whom he disagreed deserved execution, he forced them into destroying him before he destroyed them.’ (Doyle, 281).
On 1 August the Law of Prairial was repealed. In the following days there was a mass release of prisoners. In November 1795 a new government, the Directory, was set up. By this time France was becoming internally peaceful though the war was stepped up.

Here is Antonia Fraser's very interesting review of Ruth Scurr's Fatal Purity, a life of Robespierre.

Women in War and Peace

I am really interested in Tolstoy's portrayal of women in War and Peace. Initially, I was pretty happy with him. I think this was primarily because of Anna Pávlovna, the very first character introduced in the book. She seemed like a cool lady! She was independent, powerful, and very well-informed about the goings on in the world. In this same opening chapter, Hélène and Lise were also both introduced. I have to say, I thought that they were bumbling idiots at the time and to be honest my opinion hasn't really changed. Lise died before she could be very deeply developed (although she does arguably represent women wronged by the structure of marriage and society in general) and Hélène, while she has become powerful, is still treated primarily by Tolstoy as a seductive, trouble-making fool. But overall, I thought, "Who cares? These are just two small examples of silly women who hide behind their beauty." Now though, I'm not so sure for several reasons.

First off, what happened to Anna Pávlovna? Why has Tolstoy stopped mentioning her? The fact that the least "feminine" woman in the book has disappeared suggests that Tolstoy just doesn't value the idea surrounding feminism at all.

I also have a problem with Mary. I was very pro-Mary initially, seeing her the same way I saw Anna but to a slightly less extent. She was educated beyond most people's dreams, but was held back by her father. This didn't bother me too much because I thought that it meant that the family was just really tightly-knit. However, recently the Old Prince has been terrible to Mary, ultimately destroying my idea. Now she's just a smart woman wasting her potential by being held back by a man. I'm hoping that Tolstoy is doing this on purpose and will develop her more later on, but I can't be sure.

Next, Natasha. Natasha was my favorite character for quite a while. She seemed like the only one of the lot who thought for herself and had any life in her. Now that life has been crumbling away before our eyes; she's a shell of her former self.

So it seems to me like Tolstoy and strong women just don't get along well. I hope this changes, but I also understand that it would be natural for this time period for him to brush most women aside.

Photomix - Various Photos Part 3

























A Beautiful Sunset



The complementary affect of the blue sky is the red sunset or sunrise. At sunset the light from the sun reaching the observer has traveled through the most atmosphere possible and has had most of the blue component of the white light scattered resulting in predominately red light reaching the observer or illuminating clouds that the observer can see. The light at sunset is more likely to be red than sunrise because the turbulence in the atmosphere during the day can mix more particles into the atmosphere which enhance the scattering.

sunset



sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

sunset

World's Biggest Dog -"Hercules".




 Hercules was once the largest dog in the world. Now his name has become associated with a digital hoax, an Internet urban legend. A number of digitally editted photos have been ciculating on the net with pictures of "Hercules, the World's Biggest Dog". In the photos, the dog is GIANT. But there is enough info out there about the real deal Hercules to fuel the legend and keep the links and emails circulating.

And the According to the guinness Book of World records it is also a big dog.


Hercules was recently awarded the honorable distinction of Worlds Biggest Dog by Guinness World Records. Hercules is an English Mastiff and who has a 38 inch neck and weighs 282 pounds.

With "paws the size of softballs" (reports the Boston Herald), the three-year-old monster is far larger and heavier than his breed's standard 200lb. limit. Hercules owner Mr. Flynn says that Hercules weight is natural and not induced by a bizarre diet: "I fed him normal food and he just
"grew"... and grew. and grew. and grew.



Kell: Slightly Smaller, But the World's Heaviest Dog Hercules' sheer volume may have won him the Largest Dog world record, but the Heaviest Dog title still rests with Kell who weighed in at 286 pounds in August of 1999.
This English Mastiff, however, only has a 32-inch neck - far less than Hercules' 38-incher. Think about that for a second though - 32 inches is a standard waist size for a man!

Proud owner Tom Scott said Kell is two years old and is expected to continue to grow for the next two years. Kell needs to be fed 100lb of beef every week, and drinks gallons of goats' milk to sta




Beautiful Tattooed women on their back