Mainstream Media's Dishonest Collusion Against University of Minnesota's Football Players.

      Ten football players from the University of Minnesota's Gophers were suspended in September over a sexual assault accusation by a female student and her mother. Despite finding no evidence that there was actually assault in the report, (quite the contrary as we will further demonstrate) the University and the media still put these students on blast claiming that she was more "believable" over a redacted (censored) report that they kept private and didn't want to disclose.  The original report is over 80 pages, but after they redacted it, it was released as a 20 pages version of the same report. What were they hiding?


Here are a few media sources basically copying and pasting from each other trying to paint these students as guilt and nowhere do they mention the fact that this girl basically lied, which we will share in this blog article, so the reader can verify that this is yet another case of regret group sex by the female.


Here is a report by USNews:

"The school suspended the 10 players after completing its own investigation, the results of which it kept private, citing federal privacy laws. But a local TV station published a redacted copy of the 82-page report which quoted the woman as saying she believed 10 to 20 men had sex with her, though she was not certain. She told university investigators she was too traumatized to clearly remember events.
The report concluded that the victim's account of that night was more credible than the players it interviewed, and said some players tried to impede the university's investigation into the incident."

Here's one by The Chicago Tribune's report, which is identical to the previous one, and here is the ESPN report, yet another identical one.
None of these mainstream media reports provide a link to the court documents(although I was able to obtain them doing some extensive searching from a local news station).

The media also conveniently leaves out the fact that the accuser's mother was the one who initially claimed her daughter was raped and then the so-called victim seems to have been pressured to report it to the police by her mom.

Here are the damning screenshots from the actual report where we can see that the media and University are lying intentionally:

After opening up the court documents in the University of Minnesota sexual assault case, the first red flag is that the woman who claims she was sexually assaulted did not want to file a report and her mother was the one who called the police to try to file the report.

So it could be a case of where her mother found out she was having consensual group sex with these football players and she got embarrassed and claimed she was raped.

She admits they were flirting with her, she explains in detail about how she still decided to go back to one of the guy's apartment knowing he was interested in her. Now how can she remember all of this stuff if she claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sex? Also why can't she "remember" how many of the guys she slept with?

So she gets onto the guy's bed and magically she loses her memory and doesn't remember how her clothes got off, but she does remember giving him/them blowjobs but doesn't explain how any of them supposedly forced her to give them blowjobs. She admits she was trying to get him/them to ejaculate.

Here's that magical selective memory at work again. She says she might have been held down by the guys but doesn't remember whether it was real or just her fear that invented the memory.

SHE THEN AGREED TO GO BACK TO THE ROOM WITH THE GUY WHO SHE CLAIMS RAPED HER AGAIN AND HE ASKED HER IF SHE WAS COOL WITH THE GROUP SEX. If she's in "fear" of these guys then why would she go back to one of their rooms?

Here we go. She admits on pg 13 that she sat on the couch in between the guys and started "flirting" with them. Notice how they don't go into detail about what she said specifically while flirting with them? Sneaky sneaky.

She has now changed her mind and said that the sex with some of the boys "might" have been consensual but with the others it wasn't. Boy oh boy you gotta love this chick's selective memory.

Still on page 13 here and LOOK at how the police are white knighting for this chick and basically giving her the go ahead to change her story. 

Ok pay close attention to this part of the documents. In this part they describe what happened in the video footage of the incident captured by one of the football players. The police say she doesn't appear to be too intoxicated to not know what's going on, she doesn't appear to be objecting to any of the sex and the entire video is sexually playful on both ends. This important piece of the story was also left out of the media reports! 

The police then go on to describe the part of the video where she is giving one of the players a blowjob while the other player is penetrating her from behind and they say it appears to be consensual once again. She isn't slurring her words or objecting to anything in the video and is fully conscious of what is going on.

Ok the football player that she admits she probably had consensual sex with said that when she first started flirting with them she brought up the idea of having a threesome with three guys and so they offered to take her up to their apartment which she then consented to.

This is what the accuser meant when she said she "flirted" with them but strangely the police didn't seem to want to make her go into detail about what she said when she flirted with them. 

The football player by the name of Carlton showed the cops his video footage of the incident and the cops agreed that it did appear that she was conscious and a willing participant in the sex during the entire video.

 Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".  

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened

 

Even after reviewing the redacted information itself, we can read as to why the mainstream media concealed all the major facts we now know about this case and how this young woman lied about these young men, and still the media and the report itself, keep referring to her "victim".

It makes one wonder what the entire 82 pages report actually reveals when the 20 pages that were censored pretty tells us she consented to everything that happened

Ring-A-Ding In the New Year

Known as, "Ring-A-Ding Rhythm" in the US or, "It's Trad, Dad," in the UK, this little picture was directed by Richard Lester in 1962 and was turned on to me by fellow TCM obsessive, Main Line Sportsman sometime last night.  I hate to say, "last night" 'cause it's embarrassing I never heard of it.  Who cares.

It's a funky little film that mixes a fictional "Boy-Girl story with amazing B&W cinema vérité and you can see Lester's, "A Hard Day's Night" coming at you for a country mile.  It's a rough patch at the beginning but it manages to loosen up and the musical numbers are the reason to hang in there.

Bert Stern mentioned in a Lincoln Center viewing of his 1958 documentary, 'Jazz on a Summer's Day,' that it was his original intent to have a "Boy-Girl backstory with actual footage of the festival threaded throughout the film.  He eventually gave up on the idea, in large part, because there was no script and he was winging it without any idea of what to do with the story.  Lester, a sneeze in time later, seemed to pull off what Stern couldn't do with, Ring-A-Ding/It's Trad Dad.



Bizarre minutiae attends this film in spades, which really makes for a deeper appreciation. John Lennon wrote "Misery" for the "Girl" and  co star, Helen Shapiro, a uniquely attractive brunette with an even more unique and beautiful voice.  The Boy, Craig Douglas, is still touring, although in a wheel chair, and his performance, as a "local" introduced by Miss Shapiro in this clip, "Rainbow in Your Tea" is a show stealer. Then there's a bizarre appearance Craig makes in a very rare clip (that's what they say) of Russ Conway's television show, Russ Conway & a Few Friends:



Sweet, Jesus.  If I were a designer, I'd rip off this entire clip, shoot it in B&W at the Oak Room in the Algonquin and use it to feature my new line.  It certainly beats Lincoln Center.  Happy New Year.

NOW Opposed "Father's Count" Bill

        The largest feminist organization in the United States, The National Organization for Women opposed the Father's Count Bill that was designed to help poor fathers find employment so they could pay child support and to reunite them with their children. 

        Here in their statement  you can see they were motivated to oppose this bill simply because mothers were not being handed money as a result of the bill. Also they opposed it because of their rivalry with Republicans, and labeled all single fathers as "deadbeat dads".

This is how spiteful and harmful to families the feminist movement has been historically and demonstrates clearly why we call them a hate movement.

One or two "good feminists" cannot rectify the damage that has been done to so many children being deprived of their fathers out of spite.

They were so hellbent on destroying this bill, that they followed to make multiple posts even calling the action to counter it an ""Urgent Action Alert"":

Happy New Year

Piper Heidsieck Extra Dry Champage

Toby Cecchini wrote an interesting piece for the NY Times Style section last week on sabering a bottle of champagne with an eight inch kitchen knife. I'm not sure how that got through legal but I can just imagine the hipster element tonight...What a wonderful short film it would make. Keep in mind, if you lose your thumb it's very hard to open doors.

My drill would surely be considered boring but the 850 sq feet of my apartment pretty much demand it. I like Piper Heidsieck Extra Dry and have for almost 20 years. The champer's expert will tell you that Brut is the way to go with Extra Dry being too sweet -- Maybe.

But the PH Brut is too severe for me. Like one of those rail thin women lunching at Swifty's whose eyebrows are attached to the ceiling. Meanwhile the Extra Dry reminds me of Doris Day in 1975 telling Merv Griffin how much she likes sex. I'm not suggesting my deviant fantasy is any way to select champagne but it beats losing your thumb.

I chill it in a bucket with 70% ice and 30% water. If you're in a hurry, throw some salt on the ice. It's faster than a freezer and a lot less dangerous if you're forgetful. Which I am. I'm not sure why but I always think of Tony Curtis when I open champagne. The foil and cage are fairly straightforward but trivia buffs will be impressed when you tell them it always takes seven turns of the neck wire to free the cage. Always.

Now this important. Grab the cork with one hand and the bottom of the bottle with the other. Turn the bottom of the bottle but not the cork. While turning the bottom think of Doris Day in naughty underwear. Keep a firm grip on the cork pushing against the pressure. You don't want an explosion but rather something like a nun farting in a front pew. A short 'pffst' is just about perfect.

Pour into glasses...slowly. Replace bottle in bucket. Put on Que Sera, Sera and join in me a toast...

Society's Delusion of a Female Led Utopia

          The media is getting the public ready to have the first female US president by declaring in many instances that if we had more women in power, the world would be a better place. An article from the BBC reports:

"Studies also show that women also lead differently than men. They're more likely to be collaborative, inclusive and team-oriented, all characteristics that tend to be effective, particularly in today's less-hierarchical, fast-paced, innovation-driven world. 

'I think it's fair to say that women are a little more collaborative in their approach overall, and a little less driven to conflict as opposed to driven to working out problems,"'says Janet Napolitano, the US Secretary of Homeland Security. 

Mary Robinson, the former president of Ireland, says that women also bring an inter-generational perspective to their work. 'We need to take decisions now that will make for a safer world for our grandchildren and their grandchildren, and I think women are more likely to do that when they come into positions of leadership.' "

          These are easy assertions to make when the public ignores female violence and female leadership when it comes to war times. But history can tell us otherwise, it can give us better perspective to female leadership when we analyze brutal war times in human history. A very telling study investigates female rulers from since the 15th century to the 20th century. The study called Queens let us know that this concept of female perpetual benevolence is a downright myth:

           Dube and Harish, the authors of the study, spent two and a half years collecting data on kings, queens, and wars in Europe between 1480 and 1913, according to the report by PS Magazine, covering 184 monarchs—28 of them queens—in 17 different polities. Contrary to the popular view, queens were 27 percent more likely to get involved in wars. In fact, they were more likely than kings to either start wars or continue those of their predecessors, but no more likely to be involved in civil wars, suggesting that they weren't fighting to dispel external or internal perceptions of weakness.

And while this study focuses on a time period from the 15th to 20th centuries, here in the 21st, we can get a glimpse of female brutality by all-female ISIS brigades who are killing women and torturing them. 

Source: http://bit.ly/1JIYcA0

Source: http://bit.ly/1OuQbQk

New Year's Eve Morning

Quiet before the storm.

My Boxers...

...lie perfectly content under khakis,
but under jeans, not so much.

They make it easy to pee and
I even remember a girl friend
pulling them down with glee.

Now I pull them down
I see a pudge of flesh
from 21 years
of sitting behind a desk.

Dropping them over a right knee
there's still a gash
left over from a Yamaha 600
motorcycle crash.

Freckles on my thighs
never let me lie
that some of my hidden hairs
are red.

Tartan patch boxers
stolen by a one night stand.
Quid pro quo?
I don't think so.

A sister-in-law announced
over Xmas dinner
I'd spend my last $50
on a pair of green silk boxers.

Maybe, they've been with me
since the army deemed
they fit me
but I'd add
a red Olde English
monogram.

If it's all the same
to those who bury me
I would only ask
you prepare me
in Logsdail itchy wool boxers.

An eternity
I swear...
Must come
with some debonair
and I hope someone in Heaven
will scratch me.